It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Apply for Membership
↳ General Show Discussion
↳ Introduce Yourself!
↳ Assassination Research
↳ Current Events / News
↳ Everything Else
In this Discussion
General Show Discussion
Scott Enyart vs. Lisa Pease on RFK Conspiracy/shooting
On recent shows from this summer (2015), Scott Enyart said that Sirhan and Eugene Thane Cesar could not have been part of the same conspiracy; I believe that the reason he gave is that then Cesar would have been agreeing to put himself in danger of being shot by Sirhan. Lisa Pease, in a show from June, said that Sirhan was likely shooting blanks and that there were (at least) two other shooters (one toward RFK from direction similar to Sirhan and the other from either Cesar or someone very close to him). What should we make of these two positions?
I wondered about that too. Although in my 'signature' at the Rigorous Intuition blog I use a Scott Enyart quote which goes a long way to reconcile those two positions...
"You can be a willing participant in a conspiracy without knowing that you're part of it."
Jamie Scott Enyart
In other words each member of the
was on a need to know basis.
Thane Eugene Cesar
needed to know his job.
was programmed to carry out his function. As was
and whoever else was part of that operation. My guess would be that they had no idea who else was in on it. They only had to know what their jobs were.
Add a Comment
Powered by Vanilla